police (mis)conduct

[drewkitty]

I've had called to my attention (online) three separate incidents that involved police use of force. My opinions have sharply differed from the majority view.



1) Police officer shoots man who beat tot to death. (Rural road outside Turlock, CA)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/17/national/main4187588.shtml

Majority view: bystanders should have done more to stop the killer.

My view: most bystanders are neither trained nor equipped nor mentally prepared to do what is necessary to stop a deadly aggressor of this type. "Shall issue" concealed carry in California might have saved this toddler's life.

2) Campus police officer arrests popular teacher for interfering with tow of her car. (San Jose, CA, SJSU)

http://media.www.thespartandaily.com/media/storage/paper852/news/2008/03/04/News/Dispute.Over.Upd.Incident-3249889.shtml

Majority view: poor teacher beaten on by the mean cop.

My view: justified use of force.

3) Custody officer beats transgender person with handcuffs, incident caught on tape. (Memphis, TN)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25265517/

Majority view: cops should do time in jail. Custody nurse withheld aid. Discrimination against transsexuals.

My view: cops should be fired. Beatings are illegal regardless of who is the target and why. Custody nurse did her job.



Additional links will require some use of Google-fu. I read several links on each incident and feel that I have a good grasp of the details.

Any comments?

Comments

[bradhicks.livejournal.com]

Would the accused's injuries have to be life-threatening to take priority over the officers, given that the accused also had (I'm assuming?) highly visible facial damage from being beaten with a metal object, and the officers had no visible injuries? Under ordinary triage rules, what justifies her ignoring someone who's visibly injured and in distress? And even if your interpretation of her duties is that she has to take the officers' word for it that they're injured even worse and it just doesn't show, how does she justify not seeing to the accused's injuries at all once she's done with the officers? Isn't that at least one visibly injured patient in her care, under her responsibility, that's she's neglecting?