Jan. 22nd, 2018

drewkitty: (Default)
This is a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for the Globall War of Terror (GWOT) series of pieces. This is horror science fiction, all the more horrific because no fantasy or futuristic technology elements are used.

Summary: At this point, I have seven books scripted. Base page is drewkitty.dreamwidth.org but the index is only good for 1 and half of 2. I am presently (January 2020) skipping around the end of 4, the beginning of 5 and a little of 6.

Short form, is that the rawly independent California has now sent an expeditionary force to Iowa under UN auspices to try to stop a pending genocide there, in the context of a larger global war that started with the destruction of San Francisco and nuclear war with China (1), a fascist consolidation campaign in both countries (2), the main character's arrest and torture (3), war crimes trials by the Resistance (4), the new California Republic trying to control her southern border (5) ... and after the Iowa events (6), the final extinction-level confrontation between China and America (7), in which California plays a significant and unexpected role.

1) Why is "Global" incorrectly spelled?

"Globall" may be short for "glowing ball" ... as in what the planet looks like after so many nukes have gone off ... and is also a corruption of what the military in all seriousness calls the "Global War On Terror." I don't want people thinking these stories are anywhere near real.

2) Does Echo 18 have PTSD?

Yes. EVERYONE IN THIS SERIES HAS PTSD. This is an unavoidable side effect of being nuked, plus everything that has happened since.

3) Law and order seem to have broken down. Why?

Law and order in the Bay Area is being slowly, painfully restored. Everything deployable has been deployed to fight the Firecracker War in China. This even includes some law enforcement. What is left over isn't up to much, but things are getting better -- the cordon around the ruins of San Francisco, recruitment convoys, etc. are signs of this.

Law and order cycles again in III and IV. One man's revolution is another man's rebellion.

4) What is this [COMPANY], [CLIENT] stuff?

I don't want to bias the reader by either making up names of fictional companies, which would also require a Secretary of State search so I don't accidentally use a real one. While I like how Michael Williamson snuck some real security company names into his Ripple Creek series ... I don't want to emulate it. [COMPANY] could be any large security company in the world. It has been widely but incorrectly rumored that HAL is Arthur C. Clarke's anagram for IBM. And I don't choose to, in fiction, piss off companies powerful enough to enable holocausts. (I do that enough in my day job.) [CLIENT] could be any Fortune 500 company.

5) Mormons?

The Church of Latter Day Saints is an extremely powerful organization. On the last day of human existence, when all is lost and only a handful of survivors remain, there will be a Red Cross person giving aid, a United States Marine shooting back, and a member of the LDS taking genealogical notes. Echo 18 does not get along with them, but he speaks their lingo and he will use anything - literally anything - to do his job.

6) This isn't much of an Apocalypse. Why does Echo 18 keep saying that?

See #2 above.

7) I thought that nukes going off meant we were all dead.

You only wish. Even in the most pessimistic studies, a hundred weapon exchange is unlikely to do long term damage to the planet. The true horror of nuclear arms is that even a major exchange is quite survivable -- but consider this quote carefully.

"The living will envy the dead."

And they will. It may just take a while to realize it.

8) Who nuked San Francisco? And ... Burlingame?

That would be telling. And [Oliver Stone] is quite correct, the public narrative does not at all fit the facts. But does it ever?

It becomes obvious by Book 5.

9) What is the Statue of Responsibility?

In Victor Frankl's _Man's Search For Meaning_, he proposes a Statue of Responsibility on the West Coast to go with the Statue of Liberty on the East Coast.

The Statue of Responsibility is erected after the Firecracker War and the Tyranny, partly to acknowledge America's guilt.

Just because Echo 18 has dreamed of it does not mean he will survive to see it built.

10) The Firecracker War?

This is homage to Robert A. Heinlein's use of the term in _The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress_. It is also a reference to China. If you accept the public narrative, China nuked America twice and the same day, tried to nuke America twice more. Over the next six weeks, until her fangs were pulled, China attempted to nuke America over one hundred additional times - at first strategic targets, then in desperation cities. Only a handful got through.

However, the US military at last count has used over 1,000 _strategic_ nuclear weapons in China. This does not include tactical weapons. The environmental damage is horrific although much of it has yet to be seen on stage.
drewkitty: (failure is not an option)
TOP SECRET SECURE COMPARTMENTALIZED INTELLIGENCE
KEYWORD UNION JACK
NOFORN NOCOPY

THE UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS A FELONY UNDER THE LAW.

FROM: STATION CHIEF LONDON
TO: DCI
RE: UK-US SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP

UK PUBLIC REACTION TO THE FIRECRACKER WAR HAS BEEN OVERWHELMINGLY NEGATIVE. THREE OF FIVE UN SECURITY COUNCIL PERMANENT MEMBERS HAVE VOTED TO SANCTION USA - CHINA, FRANCE, AND SURPRISINGLY UK.

JOINT US-UK-AUS OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN TERMINATED FROM THE UK SIDE. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO INFORMATION GATHERING, BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE AND ACCESS TO AGENT INFORMATION. FOLLOWING CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES, KEY US PERSONNEL HAVE BEEN RETURNED TO CONUS AND CERTAIN SYSTEMS (CF ECHELON) HAVE BEEN DISABLED. UK ACCESS TO INTELINK HAS BEEN DOWNGRADED.

ROYAL NAVY HAS QUERIED USN ON CONTINUED AVAILABILITY OF TRITIUM REPLENISHMENT AND PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL DEVICES UNDER TERMS OF MANHATTAN PROJECT. USN HAS NOT REPLIED. ROYAL NAVY ANTICIPATES NEGATIVE ANSWER AND HAS WITHDRAWN ACCESS TO UK NUCLEAR ARMS FROM US TECHNICAL EXPERTS.

FURTHER, ROYAL NAVY HAS SORTIED ALL TRIDENT CAPABLE SUBMARINES AND HAS CEASED SHARING RELATED TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC INFORMATION WITH USA. A SOURCE INDICATES THAT THIS IS EMPHASIS SPECIFICALLY END EMPHASIS TO DETER US FROM NUCLEAR ATTACK ON UK.

AS HAS BEEN UK PRACTICE, A LETTER FROM THE PRIME MINISTER TO EACH ROYAL NAVY BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINE COMMANDER HAS BEEN COURIERED TO EACH SUBMARINE PRIOR TO SORTIE. THE CONTENTS OF THIS LETTER ARE NEVER DISCLOSED. HOWEVER, THAT AN UPDATED LETTER HAS NOW BEEN ISSUED SUGGESTS CONTINGENCY INSTRUCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE UNITED STATES.

UK TRIDENT CAPABLE BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINES MUST NOW BE CONSIDERED POTENTIALLY HOSTILE.

COMPREHENSIVE TEST BAN TREATY ORGANIZATION HAS ALSO SEVERED TIES WITH US MILITARY BUT HAS RENEWED TIES WITH UK MONITORING AND ROYAL NAVY PLATFORMS WORLDWIDE. CTBTO CONTINUES TO PROVIDE DETAILED, UP TO THE MINUTE INFORMATION ON DETONATION OF NUCLEAR ARMS IN CHINA BY US OCCUPATION FORCES.

INSTRUCTION BY YOUR OFFICE TO CARRY OUT WET WORK OPERATION AGAINST CTBTO IN SWITZERLAND REJECTED WITH PREJUDICE. 1) UNABLE DUE TO EXTREMELY LIMITED RESOURCES. ALSO WE ARE UNABLE TO SCREEN US OPERATIVES FROM UK SURVEILLANCE MEASURES SUCH AS "RING OF STEEL" 2) WOULD RESULT IN EXPULSION OF ALL US DIPLOMATIC PERSONNEL FROM ALL EUROPEAN NATIONS. 3) SWISS LIKELY TO RETALIATE THROUGH INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY EXCHANGES.

ROYAL NAVY AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FORCE - 14 SHIPS, 2 SUBMARINES - CONTINUES TO OPERATE IN AND AROUND THE HONG KONG AREA. HONG KONG HAS CLAIMED AFFIRMATIVE NEUTRALITY IN THE WAR AND HAS NOT YET BEEN ATTACKED. HOWEVER UK IS SAID TO BE CONSIDERING ABROGATING THE 1897 TREATY AND RESTORING HONG KONG TO UK CONTROL, FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE CITY.

PER SOURCE ROYAL NAVY FORCES ON DIEGO GARCIA ARE CONTINUING PREPARATIONS FOR EVACUATION OF THIS FORMERLY JOINT FACILITY. RECOMMEND CONTINGENCY MEASURES.

BRITISH ANTARCTIC SOCIETY IS EVACUATING ALL BASES ON THE CONTINENT WITH ASSISTANCE OF ARGENTINA AND CHILE. FALKLAND ISLANDS HAVE BEEN CEDED TO DE FACTO ARGENTINIAN CONTROL. THE PURPOSE OF THIS CAN ONLY BE TO FREE UP ROYAL NAVY FORCES FROM THEIR LONG FOCUS ON THE SOUTH ATLANTIC - IN FAVOR OF PROTECTING FROM A GREATER (USA) THREAT.

CONCLUSIONS:

1) THE LONG STANDING US-UK SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP SINCE WORLD WAR II IS NOW DEAD.

2) ROYAL NAVY MUST BE CONSIDERED POTENTIAL ADVERSARY FORCE, NO LONGER ALLIED.

3) REMAINING FOREIGN INFLUENCE OF UK IS LIKELY TO BE EXERTED TO ATTEMPT TO PROTECT HONG KONG FROM SIDE EFFECTS OF FIRECRACKER WAR.

4) HOMELAND SECURITY WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO RELY ON UK ANALYSIS OF ECHELON DATA FOR DOMESTIC COUNTERINSURGENCY.

END MESSAGE.

Profile

drewkitty: (Default)
drewkitty

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 01:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios